Foreign
Relations, Foreign Relations, 1969-1976, Documents on South Asia, 1969-1972
Released by the Office of the
Historian
TELEGRAM
ACTION Amembassy
ISLAMABAD IMMEDIATE
INFO: Amembassy
NEW DELHI
USUN NEW YORK Amembassy LONDON Amembassy MOSCOW Amembassy TEHRAN
Amembassy PARIS
Amconsul DACCA
Amconsul CALCUTTA
STATE
Deliver opening of Business Dec. 19.
SUBJECT: Secretary's Conversation with Bhutto
1. Following is uncleared Memcon,
FYI, and subject to revision upon review.
2. Pak Deputy PM-designate, Z. A.
Bhutto, called on Secretary December 18 prior to call on President. Bhutto
accompanied by Ambassador Raza. Sisco
and Laingen sat in. Bhutto expressed deep
appreciation that US had stood by Pakistan in defense QUOTE basic principles
international law and civilized society UNQUOTE, indicated strong concern over
Soviet policies in achieving QUOTE reversal of Cubas
at Pakistan's cost UNQUOTE, and pledged determination seek reconciliation with
India. Essential, however, that Indian forces leave East Pakistan promptly; said he thought it still possible preserve
Pak unity on basis very loose confederation. In any event effort must be made
and he was returning to Pakistan forthwith not to rock boat but to do what he could in
context transfer of political power which now vital and urgent. Secretary
stressed strong USG support for Pakistan, understanding for severe problems ahead, and intention
continue be as helpful as possible. Assured
Bhutto we would consult closely before any action re Bangla
Desh but noted likelihood we would need and wish to
support international humanitarian relief that area.
(Continued next page)
3. Secretary gave Bhutto warm welcome,
emphasizing our understanding that this was sad time in history Pakistan and
that we very pleased to get Bhutto's views directly regarding future and
what we can do together to be helpful. Noted we have tried to do what we could
to help in current crisis and that president particularly was understanding and
sympathetic on basis certain basic principles and was looking forward to
meeting Bhutto later in day.
4. Bhutto said he wanted to make clear
at outset that although sometimes referred to as "Yankee-baiting Former
Foreign Minister," he was determined to open new chapter in history
Pakistan-US relations. Pakistan deeply grateful to USG for standing
by basic principles of international law and civilized society as these had
emerged' after World War II. US
actions and statements in current crisis were important in demonstrating that
World War II had not been fought in vain.
5. Bhutto said he wished to make two
fundamental points: First, that the whole picture of
international law had been disrupted by Soviet behavior in the South Asian
crisis and second, that he, Bhutto, was prepared for reconciliation with India. On first point, Bhutto noted that Soviets had
reportedly gone even to point of providing Soviet personnel on Indian warships
and that they had otherwise equiped Indian vessels
and aircraft with latest missiles and technology. He did not know if this true
or not but what was true Paks had fought India before but never the Soviet Union. Later was that "Soviets had defeated us."
had now reversed their defeat in Cuba at Pakistan's cost. Their objective was to show China that not they but rather the Soviets were the leaders
of the Third World.
6. Second fundamental point was that he and Pakistani people were. prepared for reconciliation with India. India now has glorious opportunity either to seek
reconciliation with Pakistan or become enemy of Pakistan, for all time on scale like Carthage and Rome. If India
missed present opportunity, there would be hatred for all time, utter chaos and
terrible massacre. He shuddered to think what this could mean for Muslims in Bengal.
Moreover, this hatred would spread to whole subcontinent: India must act with magnanimity. Honorable adjustments
between two countries could be made but these could not be made in vacuum and
would require time.
7. To that end, Bhutto said he was being
called home by Yahya and understood special plane was
meeting him tomorrow in Rome. He
was anxious to get back "to see how land lies." He would tell President
that either there would now be immediate transfer of political power so that he
could grapple with enormous problems facing Pakistan or he would go back to his "small ranch in Sind." He was not going back to rock the boat or to
challenge authority. He had done that before in Ayub
period but country was in too much of mess now to do this. (In some
contradiction to this line, he made point elsewhere during conversation he
hoped people of Pakistan would not have to fight another war to achieve
political transfer of power in West
Pakistan.)
8. Bhutto said that much of tragedy
since March could have been avoided had there not been inordinate delay in
transfer
of power. Military action on 25 March was inevitable but what happened
thereafter was not justified and could have been avoided by transfer of power.
If government could not carry the people with it, then everyone in government
would be pygmies and Pakistan would go from one difficulty to another.
9. However, Indians and others must
understand that he, Bhutto, would need a month or more to prepare public
opinion for what has taken place. He understood there were already reports of
demonstrations and other trouble in West Pakistan over
cease-fire agreement. India must
act in humility; if it had demands on Pakistan, it should make them through diplomatic channels.
Unhappily Indians lack vision and he could not be confident of Indian response.
10. Bhutto said he must ask USG kindly
not to act in haste in recognition of so-called Bangla
Desh. He was convinced that sentiment still
overwhelmingly pro Pakistan in both wings. This clearly demonstrated by fact India had to use military forces to achieve its ends in East Pakistan. Recognition could wait; there were certain
preconditions normal to such action in any event in international law which
must be met, and Pakistan would hope USG would keep in close touch with Pakistan before acting.
11. Secretary took note of Bhutto's hope
India would act with magnanimity but noted that despite
capacity of Indians often to appear magnanimous publicly and on the record,
they could be very sanctimonious and self-righteous and act quite differently
privately. Bhutto concurred and said it most Important for this reason that USG
not lose current political initiative. US should make clear to India that it had treaty relationship with Pakistan and that it was not going to fold up its carpets and
leave." India should also be made to understand from US that latter
giving serious consideration to massive economic assistance and considering
military assistance in order to restore strategic balance
in South Asia. Indians must understand from US that it has major
global interests that have been adversely affected by recent Soviet action South Asia and that it would take these into account in seeking long-term
permanent settlement. Indians should also hear from US that they could not do
one thing in East Pakistan and something else in Kashmir. Indians had used force in East Pakistan but
what of Kashmir?
12. These were things that USG should now
be telling. India. Whether USG could in fact provide military and
economic aid now was not so important. (He aware of public opinion trends in
US.) USG and GOP could talk about such things later; important thing was that India should have clear understanding that we considering
such action. Secretary commented that India should also understand that accom
plishing secession of a neighboring state by force
was dangerous principle with widespread consequences. Bhutto agreed,saying this was dangerous
Pandora's box.
13. Secretary observed that he hoped that Bhutto understood that USG would be
under strong pressure public opinion to continue involve itself
actively in humanitarian relief actions in Bangla Desh. Bhutto said he understood this but hoped it would be
done in way that would not imply recognition and would not complicate GOP's
negotiating stance on future of East
Pakistan.
14. In response questions by Secretary and Sisco re
future evolution East-West Pakistan relations, Bhutto said Pakistan ready and
willing negotiate new arrangement, It was important, however, that this be done
by people of Pakistan and that there must be withdrawal Indian forces. Mujib was important element but public opinion must first
be prepared for his,reinvolvement
in picture and he did not in any event believe Mujib
would remain influential political figure beyond three months' time. Mujib was good speaker but "very blank in the
head."
He could have had all he wanted in March. Only history would be able to say,
however, who the real culprit was in March, i.e . ,
"Mujib, Yahya, or
me." In response , questions,'Bhutto
declined name others in AL
leadership who might assume leading role. Said there were others
but they were not men of vision. Unfortunately, East Pakistan had suffered politically during 13 years of military,
regime and only Suhrawardy had ever achieved
prominence. Bhutto observed that Soviets undoubtedly now actively pushing their
own kind of people to the fore
in Bangla Desh leadership.
15. Secretary asked what basic stance
Bhutto thought USG should take toward East Pakistan.
Bhutto's response was that US could not be unfriendly to 70 million people
These people would be heavily dependent on USG since India could obviously do
little to help them and only US could Promise "hope." In response
specific query from Secretary, Bhutto said hem. convinced
that confederation on "very loose
basis" would have been possible in past between East and West Pakistan; he could not say with certainty whether this now
possible but it was important that people of Pakistan be allowed to make an effort to accomplish, this.
Tragically, what had now happened had set back development in East Pakistan by fifty years. India could do nothing to help in this respect.
16. Bhutto said Mrs. Gandhi now faced
dangerous situation. She had laid basis for "Bangla
Deshes allover Subcontinent." (At separate
point, referred to "bug of secession" that could spread very fast
in-West Pakistan if previous balance -between East
and West not present.) Said Mrs. Gandhi would rue the day she had "gone to
bed with Soviet bear." Soviets had no humanitarian instincts at all.
17 In concluding exchange, Bhutto
emphasized again his intention to seek as close a relationship as possible with
US. Stressed however that he was "slave of geography" and therefore
convinced Pakistan must have balance in its foreign policy. He
convinced, for example, that experiences of recent past had demonstrated that
this balance important for-US as well. If there had not been that balance, with
China playing important role, USG would have faced
"terrible liability" in terms need provide military equipment for Pakistan. Secretary concluded by saying that we fully
appreciative of very tough job facing Pakistani leadership; USG would be
watching and helping as much as it could and in every way possible in ways that
would not complicate Pakistan's difficulties or suggest that we second-guessing
their decisions in any way. We would, of course, be under strong compulsion act
in humanitarian relief Bangla Desh
but again, he wanted Bhutto to know we would do this only in ways that would
not complicate Pakistan's problems. GP-3
END
ROGERS
Source: Doc 193, vol E7, South Asia Crisis,
Department of State.