Secret Telegram

December 9, 1971

From: American Embassy London

To: Secretary State, Washington DC

 

Subject: British views on Indo-Pak Situation

 

1. British position on Indo-Pakistan situation remains consistent. Sutherland told us today that HMG believes USG has made tactical error in taking public stance critical of Indians. In FCO view, both sides are at fault and it is essentially sterile exercise at this juncture to attempt to apportion greater blame to one side or other. British determination not to put themselves in this posture springs from this conclusion, and from their conviction that it is in British interest to be able to have reasonable relations with India and Bangla Desh when conflict is over.

 

2. Aside from this tactical difference, however, Sutherland feels USG and HMG understanding and assessment of situation on sub­continent is essentially the same.

 

3. Sutherland said HMG has brought itself to accept situation in East, but is concerned about Indian intentions in West. There is some sus­picion here that Indians, once they have completed operations in East, will attempt to seize Azad Kashmir with intention of holding it. British Hicomer Garvey has "more than once" seen top levels MFA under instructions to attempt to obtain GOI statement that capture and retention of Azad Kashmir is not rpt not one of Indian objectives in this war. Garvey has been unsuccessful to date, but FCO is having him continue to press Indians on this. Argument being stressed to In­dians is that, whereas world may bring itself to swallow what Indians are doing in East, any Indian attempt to hold territory in West would result in complete international condemnation. Sutherland told us FCO feels Indians would lose even Soviet support if they try take­over in Kashmir.

 

 

 

Source: Bangladesh Liberation War and the Nixon House 1971, Enayetur Rahim and Joyce L. Rahim, Pustaka Dhaka, p – 431