Editorial
Note
President
Nixon, Secretary of State Rogers, and National Security Assistant Kissinger met
in the Oval Office of the White House at 12:30 p.m. on November
24, 1971,
to discuss developments in South Asia in light of the
expanding conflict in East Pakistan. Rogers began the conversation
by denying that there was any difference in perspective on South Asia between the White House
and the Department of State and offering his assessment of how the United States should respond to the
crisis. "First, it seems to me we should engage in the maximum diplomatic
efforts to do everything we can to caution restraint on both sides at the
highest level always so that everyone can look at the record and see that we
have done everything that we can diplomatically. Secondly, I think that our
relations with Yahya are good and should continue to
be good and we should continue to keep very close to him. Three, I don't think
we should try to mastermind a political solution. I never thought so. I don't
think it is possible and I think he [Yahya] is coming
to the conclusion that something has to be done politically."
Rogers went on: "He is
going to have to do it on his own." He added: "I think he is going to
be forced to do something, either that or he is going to get out. There is the
possibility that he will turn over to Bhutto, which would not be a good
development. . . . I think the thing we have to face up to, and not make any
decisions so this is not to ask you to decide anything, but I think, I want to
express my view that I think it is probably going to get worse. I don't see any
solution for-so I think our principal objective should be to do what we can to
prevent fighting from breaking out."
Nixon
referred to news reports on the fighting in East Pakistan and asked if the
Indians were still denying that they had divisions fighting there.
Rogers responded that they
were denying it and that while they did not have divisions involved, India was in East Pakistan in brigade strength.
Kissinger noted that the Indian brigades were supported by artillery, air, and
armor. Rogers concluded that India would "get more
involved" in the fighting in East Pakistan and that Pakistan's position would
progressively deteriorate. "I think we have to face the fact that Yahya's position militarily is extremely weak. He's got
60-80 thousand men in East Pakistan." Nixon
interjected: "He'll be demolished there." Rogers pointed to the logistical
problems confronted by Pakistan. "It is a 2500
mile flight" to resupply the troops in East Pakistan. "The logistics,
you know, are impossible . . . . My own judgment is that probably it will get
worse, and probably we will have to face up to the fact that it will get
worse." He added: "Our ability to affect the course of events is
quite limited." Rogers noted that he had
instructed Department of State officials to delay processing export licenses to
India and not to make any
commitments on economic assistance to India. But he felt that these
were effectively symbolic gestures that would not serve to deter India: "The leverage we
have on India is very minimal. If we
take some action against them, which you might decide to do, it would be
symbolic rather than substantive."
There was
inconclusive discussion about whether anything would be gained by submitting
the crisis to the United Nations Security Council. Nixon then reverted to
Rogers' observation that the United States appeared to be limited
to symbolic gestures in attempting to restrain India. "I know it can be
said that it won't do any good, and we don't have any leverage, and it's only
symbolic and the rest. But on the other hand, I want you to look into what we
could do that is symbolic because "I think we need some symbolism."
He recognized the realities of the situation: "Looking at the balance
there, the Indians are going to win. . . . Pakistan will
disintegrate." It was therefore "very much in our interest to get the
damned thing cooled if we can. . . . Under those circumstances, it seems to me
that, clearly apart from the fact that Yahya has been
more decent to us than she has, clearly apart from that, I think that our
policy wherever we can should definitely be tilted toward Pakistan, and not toward India. I think India is more at fault. . . .
Having said that, it seems to me that our whole game has got to be played-if
you could find something symbolic to do I think it really has to be . . . [He
did not complete this thought.] She knows that we did not shoot blanks when she
was here. Maybe it doesn't mean anything . . . . In terms of the merits of the
situation, to the extent that we can tilt it toward Pakistan, I would prefer to play
that. That's where the UN game comes in." Rogers felt that if the issue
was taken up by the United Nations "Pakistan will come off better
than India."
Rogers "agreed
fully" that the United States should tilt toward Pakistan. The question was how
to do it. He felt there were several possibilities. "One would be right
now we'd just announce that we're not going to grant any more export licenses.
. . . We actually could embargo everything in the pipeline. . . . We may have
$10 or $15 million worth in the pipeline, . . .
military equipment. . . . We could say that we're not going to permit economic
assistance [to be] committed, it's about $11 million worth. It's insignificant.
I think that would be probably not a wise thing to do because we're going to
have to provide help for them for the refugees anyway." Rogers added that "300
and some odd million is done in irrevocable letters of credit, so we can't get
out of that." Nixon said "I just may want to take a hard line on
that." Kissinger agreed with Rogers that it would be hard
to finesse the letters of credit that had been issued.
Whatever the
constraints, Nixon was determined to do something that might serve to restrain India: "I feel that we
ought to do something symbolic, I really . . . feel that something symbolic
might have an effect on restraining India." Rogers suggested an
announcement on November 26 of a suspension of any further export licenses.
Nixon indicated that he wanted to review his policy options before meeting
again on November 26. He was wary of economic sanctions that might prove
"useless." He said he was looking for an approach that was "very
firm." "In anything that we say," he added, "there should
be a very positive statement that the United States commitment to help
refugees, to help hungry people, et cetera remains." He felt that military
assistance, on the other hand, should be halted.
The
conversation continued with Kissinger's interpretation of India's objectives in the
crisis. He saw India as striving to split
the two wings of Pakistan, with West Pakistan ultimately reduced to
the status of Afghanistan, and East Pakistan similarly reduced to
the status of Bhutan. Rogers viewed the conflict as
growing out of the deeply ingrained sectarian animosity that had animated the
initial division of the subcontinent. There was general agreement with Nixon's
assessment of Yahya Khan as a "decent and
reasonable man" if "not always smart politically." All three
viewed the prospect of Yahya stepping aside in favor
of Bhutto with trepidation. Nixon's assessment of Bhutto was that he was
"a total demagogue." In a concluding admonition to Rogers and
Kissinger, Nixon said: "I don't want to get caught in the business where
we take the heat for a miserable war that we had nothing to do with."
(National Archives, Nixon Presidential Materials, White House Tapes, Recording
of conversation among Nixon, Rogers and Kissinger, November 24, 971, 12:27-1:12
p.m., Oval Office, Conversation No. 624-21) A transcript of this conversation
is published in Foreign Relations, 1969-1976, volume E-7, Documents on South Asia, 1969-1972, Document 156.
Source: Document 199, volume XI, South
Asia crisis 1971, Department of State.